Mailbloc vs Castle.io: Simple Signup Validation vs Behavioral Security

Compare Mailbloc and Castle.io for preventing fake signups. Focused email/IP validation at $0-39/mo vs comprehensive account security at enterprise pricing.

Start Free Forever View Pricing

Mailbloc vs Castle.io at a Glance

Feature	Mailbloc	Castle.io
Free Plan	Unlimited API calls	1,000 API calls/month
Pricing Transparency	$0 or $39/month	Contact sales (enterprise pricing)
Typical Cost	$0-39/month	$1,000s-$4,000+/month
Setup Time	2 minutes	15-60 minutes
Primary Focus	Signup fraud prevention	Account security & takeover
Email Validation	✅ Full (MX, disposable, reputation)	✅ Basic (disposable detection)
IP Reputation	✅ Yes (70+ blocklists)	✅ Yes (anonymizer detection)
Device Fingerprinting	❌ No (keeps it simple)	✅ Yes (persistent)
Behavioral Analysis	❌ No	✅ Yes (advanced ML)
Bot Detection	❌ No (use at signup)	✅ Yes (advanced)
Account Takeover Protection	❌ No (different use case)	✅ Yes (core feature)
Integration Complexity	Simple (1 API endpoint)	Complex (SDK + multiple endpoints)
Target Audience	SMBs, startups, solo devs	Mid-market to enterprise
Best Use Case	Blocking fake signups	Comprehensive account security

Detailed Comparison: Features, Pricing & More

💰 Pricing: Transparent vs Enterprise

Mailbloc Pricing

✅ Free Forever: Unlimited API calls, 30 req/min
✅ Pro: $39/month flat rate
✅ 100 req/min rate limit on Pro
✅ No contracts, cancel anytime
✅ Price visible on website
✅ No sales calls required

💡 See exactly what you'll pay before signing up

Castle.io Pricing

⚠️ Free: 1,000 API calls/month only
⚠️ Pro: Usage-based (contact sales)
⚠️ Enterprise: Custom pricing
⚠️ Median cost: $52,000/year (Vendr data)
⚠️ Pricing not publicly listed
⚠️ Sales calls required for paid plans

⚠️ Typical cost: $1,000s-$4,000+ per month

💰 Potential Savings

At Castle's median pricing of $52,000/year vs Mailbloc Pro at $468/year, you save $51,532 annually (99% cost reduction) while still blocking most signup fraud.

🎯 Use Cases: Different Problems

Mailbloc is Best For:

✅ Signup fraud: Fake accounts at registration
✅ Disposable emails: Temporary/burner addresses
✅ IP reputation: Known bad actors
✅ MX validation: Invalid email domains
✅ Simple fraud detection: Clear risk levels

💡 "Is this signup legitimate?" - answered in one API call

Castle.io is Best For:

✅ Account takeover: Credential stuffing attacks
✅ Behavioral anomalies: Unusual user patterns
✅ Multi-accounting: One person, many accounts
✅ Bot attacks: Sophisticated automation
✅ Session security: Ongoing monitoring

💡 "Is this user's behavior suspicious?" - requires ongoing monitoring

Key Insight:

These tools solve different problems. Mailbloc stops fraud at signup. Castle monitors and protects accounts after signup. Most applications need Mailbloc's approach first, and only add Castle later if account takeover becomes a problem.

⚡ Features: Focused vs Comprehensive

Mailbloc Features

✅ Email validation (syntax, MX, SMTP)
✅ Disposable email detection
✅ IP reputation (70+ blocklists)
✅ Proxy/VPN/TOR detection
✅ Simple risk classification (4 levels)
✅ ML-powered fraud detection (Pro)
✅ Fast DNS resolution
❌ No device fingerprinting
❌ No behavioral analysis
❌ No account takeover protection

Castle.io Features

✅ Device fingerprinting (persistent)
✅ Behavioral analysis (ML-powered)
✅ Bot detection (advanced)
✅ Account takeover protection
✅ Multi-accounting detection
✅ Real-time risk scoring
✅ Custom policies and rules
✅ Session monitoring
⚠️ Basic email validation
⚠️ Limited MX checking

🚀 Integration: 2 Minutes vs 60 Minutes

Mailbloc Integration

Step 1: Sign up, get API token (30 sec)

Step 2: Add one API call to signup form (1 min)

Step 3: Handle response with if/else (30 sec)

  GET 'https://api.mailbloc.com/[email protected]&ip=1.12.1.12’\
  -H "Authorization: Bearer {YOUR_API_KEY}”

  Response:
  
  {"risk_level": "high", "reasons": ["disposable_email", "datacenter_ip"]} // Done!

✅ Total time: 2 minutes

Castle.io Integration

Step 1: Install SDK (10 min)

Step 2: Configure device fingerprinting (15 min)

Step 3: Instrument key events (20 min)

Step 4: Set up policies and rules (15 min)

Step 5: Test and tune (varies)

    // Client-side SDK setup
    // Server-side event tracking
    // Policy configuration
    // Rule management
    // Much more complex...

⚠️ Total time: 60+ minutes

🤔 Which Should You Choose?

Choose Mailbloc if:

✅ You're preventing fake signups
✅ You need simple, transparent pricing
✅ You're a startup or SMB
✅ Budget is a concern
✅ You want fast integration
✅ Email/IP validation is your main need
✅ You don't need behavioral monitoring

Choose Castle.io if:

• Account takeover is a major threat
• You need ongoing behavioral monitoring
• Multi-accounting is a problem
• Budget isn't a constraint
• You have enterprise security needs
• You can handle complex integration
• You need sophisticated bot detection

💡 Can You Use Both?

Actually, yes! They serve different purposes:

🔸 Use Mailbloc at signup: Block fake accounts before they're created
🔸 Use Castle for existing accounts: Protect against takeovers and abuse

But here's the truth: most startups and SMBs only need Mailbloc. Account takeover is a problem that emerges later, when you have valuable accounts worth stealing. Start with Mailbloc's simple fraud prevention, then add Castle only if you grow into needing behavioral security.

Common Questions

Why does Castle cost so much more than Mailbloc?

Castle is a comprehensive account security platform with device fingerprinting, behavioral analysis, and ongoing session monitoring. That sophistication requires complex infrastructure and higher costs. Mailbloc focuses narrowly on signup validation, which is simpler but solves the same core problem for most applications.

Does Castle's behavioral analysis catch more fraud?

For account takeover and post-signup abuse, yes. But for signup fraud, email/IP validation catches 90%+ of fake accounts. Castle's behavioral features shine when monitoring existing user sessions, not at initial registration. Most developers find Mailbloc's approach sufficient for signup validation.

Should I use Castle if I need device fingerprinting?

If device fingerprinting is critical to your fraud strategy, Castle or IPQS are better choices. Mailbloc intentionally skips device fingerprinting to keep integration simple and avoid JavaScript dependencies. For signup validation, email/IP checks are usually sufficient.

Can I switch from Castle to Mailbloc?

If you're only using Castle for signup validation (email/IP checking), yes - Mailbloc is a drop-in replacement that's much simpler and cheaper. But if you're actively using Castle's behavioral monitoring, account takeover protection, or device fingerprinting, you'd lose those capabilities.

Which integrates faster?

Mailbloc is dramatically faster. It's one API endpoint with a simple request/response. Castle requires SDK installation, client-side fingerprinting setup, and complex event instrumentation. Most developers integrate Mailbloc in under 5 minutes vs 60+ minutes for Castle.

Stop Fake Signups in 2 Minutes, Not 2 Hours

Get simple, effective signup fraud prevention without the complexity and cost of enterprise account security platforms. Forever free plan. No SDK required.

Start Free Forever Compare Pricing

No credit card required • Unlimited API calls • One endpoint integration